Bureaucrats, Comment administrators, editor, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, Widget editors
11,019
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
After In this formulation, it wasn't clear whether employed methods follow from ''all'' or only ''some'' of the acceptance accepted theories and employed methods of [[Zoe Sebastien]]'s the time. This led to a logical paradox which was [[Modification:2016-0001|suggested modificationresolved]] by Sebastien in 2016. In her reformulation of the law, the answer to the question of Sebastien made explicit that an employed method employment is provided by Sebastienneed not necessarily follow from ''all'' other employed methods and accepted theories but only from ''some''s formulation of the third lawthem. This made it possible for an employed method to be logically inconsistent and yet [[The Zeroth Law|compatible]] with openly accepted [[Methodology|methodological dicta]].
Mechanism of Method Employment (view source)
Revision as of 21:06, 30 August 2016
, 21:06, 30 August 2016no edit summary
|History=In the context of scientonomy the answer to this question has been traditionally provided by ''the third law''. Until 2016 it was the third law as formulated by [[Hakob Barseghyan]].[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 54]]
|Related Topics=Mechanism of Theory Acceptance, Role of Sociocultural Factors in Scientific Change,
|Related Theories=The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Third Law (Sebastien-2016),
