Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,390 bytes added ,  16:08, 2 November 2016
Created page with "{{Topic |Question=Can a method become employed by being the deductive consequence of an already accepted methodology? How would this affect the Methodology Can Shape Methods t..."
{{Topic
|Question=Can a method become employed by being the deductive consequence of an already accepted methodology? How would this affect the Methodology Can Shape Methods theorem?
|Topic Type=Descriptive
|Description=A [[Methodology(Barseghyan-2015)|methodology]] is a set of explicitly formulated rules of theory assessment, and is a kind of theory, whereas a [[Method (Barseghyan-2015)|method]] is a set of requirements actually employed in theory assessment. Methods are implicit, and need not always correspond to the accepted methodology. The [[The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015)|Third Law, the Law of Method Employment]], would seem to imply that methods can be deduced from methodologies. However, the [[Methodology Can Shape Method theorem (Barseghyan-2015)|Methodology Can Shape Method theorem]] states that this can only happen if the requirements of the method implement abstract requirements of some other employed method, a seeming problem for the Third Law.
|Parent Topic=Mechanism of Method Employment
|Authors List=Mirka Loiselle,
|Formulated Year=2016
}}
{{Acceptance Record
|Community=Community:Scientonomy
|Accepted From Era=CE
|Accepted From Year=2016
|Accepted From Month=April
|Accepted From Day=1
|Accepted From Approximate=No
|Acceptance Indicators=It was acknowledged as an open question by the seminar of 2016.
|Still Accepted=Yes
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
}}
2,020

edits

Navigation menu