Tautological Status of Question Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-Levesley-Pandey-2023)

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Is the question rejection theorem suggested by Barseghyan, Levesley, and Pandey in 2023 a tautology?

The question is whether the question rejection theorem suggested by Barseghyan, Levesley, and Pandey in 2023 forbids any conceivable courses of action.

In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Aayu Pandey in 2023. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community.

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record of the Question

Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
CommunityAccepted FromAcceptance IndicatorsStill AcceptedAccepted UntilRejection Indicators
Scientonomy28 December 2023This is when Pandey suggested the first answer to the question, which is a solid indicator that the question is itself accepted.Yes

All Direct Answers

The following direct answers to the question have been suggested:
TheoryFormulationFormulated In
Question Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-Levesley-Pandey-2023) is Tautological (Pandey-2023)The question rejection theorem suggested by Barseghyan, Levesley, and Pandey in 2023 is tautological.2023

If a direct answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Direct Answers

No direct answer to this question has ever been accepted.

Suggested Modifications

Here is a list of modifications concerning direct answers to this question:
Modification Community Date Suggested Summary Date Assessed Verdict Verdict Rationale
Sciento-2023-0003 Scientonomy 28 December 2023 Accept that the first law and its corollaries are tautologies. Also accept that the rejection theorems are tautologies. Open The modification can only become accepted once modification Sciento-2024-0001 becomes accepted.

Current View

At the moment, the question has no accepted answer in Scientonomy.


Related Topics