What is technological theory? How should it be defined?
It is conceivable that technological theories may turn out to be part of the mosaic. So, a proper definition of the term is of great importance.
In the scientonomic context, this term was first used by Paul Patton in 2016.
The question was formulated during the seminar of 2016.
|Community||Accepted From||Acceptance Indicators||Still Accepted||Accepted Until||Rejection Indicators|
|Scientonomy||22 January 2016||No||13 January 2023||It was decided during an editorial meeting that we don't need to add any terms for specific fields of inquiry or even large groupings such as Empirical Science, Formal Science, etc. since these are presumably local distinctions.|
There is currently no accepted answer to this question.
There is currently no accepted view concerning the existence of technological theories.
No classes are currently accepted as being disjoint with this class.
No classes are currently accepted as subtypes of technological theory.
No classes are currently accepted as supertypes of technological theory.
No associations of technological theory are currently accepted.
If a question concerning the ontology of technological theory is missing, please add it here.
If a question concerning the dynamics of technological theory is missing, please add it here.
This term is also related to the following topic(s):