Difference between revisions of "Status of Questions"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Topic | {{Topic | ||
− | |Question= | + | |Question=What is the status of '''questions''' ('''problems''', '''topics''') in the mosaic? Are questions (problems, topics) separate entities, or can they be reduced to theories? |
|Topic Type=Descriptive | |Topic Type=Descriptive | ||
− | |Description=The relevance of | + | |Description=The relevance of a question (problem, topic) changes with the mosaic. It is important to identify what status questions have in the mosaic, i.e. whether or not they are their own entities, and whether or not they can be treated as theories. |
|Authors List=Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan, | |Authors List=Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan, | ||
|Formulated Year=2016 | |Formulated Year=2016 |
Revision as of 20:00, 2 November 2016
What is the status of questions (problems, topics) in the mosaic? Are questions (problems, topics) separate entities, or can they be reduced to theories?
The relevance of a question (problem, topic) changes with the mosaic. It is important to identify what status questions have in the mosaic, i.e. whether or not they are their own entities, and whether or not they can be treated as theories.
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by William Rawleigh in 2018. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community.
In Scientonomy, the accepted answer to the question is:
- There is such a thing as a question.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 12 May 2018 | Existence of Question became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of Question. This is when Rawleigh's The Status of Questions in the Ontology of Scientific Change that offered a definition of question was published. This is a good indication that the question of how question is to be defined is considered legitimate by the community. | Yes |
All Theories
Theory | Formulation | Formulated In |
---|---|---|
Question Exists | There is such a thing as a question. | 2018 |
If an answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
Community | Theory | Accepted From | Accepted Until |
---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | Question Exists | 26 September 2018 |
Suggested Modifications
Modification | Community | Date Suggested | Summary | Verdict | Verdict Rationale | Date Assessed |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sciento-2018-0002 | Scientonomy | 12 May 2018 | Accept the ontology of epistemic elements with theories, methods, and questions as distinct epistemic elements. | Accepted | Following several focused discussions - both in-person and on the discussion page of this modification - it was finally decided that the modification is to be accepted. Three important clarifications were made. First, it was noted that Rawleigh only shows that questions cannot be reduced either to methods or to theories, but it is still conceivable "that questions may be functions of both theories and methods simultaneously".c1 Second, it was decided that accepting the modification is still warranted, since currently we don't have any idea how questions could be reduced to a conjunction of theories and methods.c2 Third, scientonomists are actively encouraged to pursue the question of possibility of reducing questions to a conjunction of theories and methods.c3 | 26 September 2018 |
Current View
In Scientonomy, the accepted answer to the question is Question Exists.
Question Exists states: "There is such a thing as a question."
Rawleigh argued that questions are an integral part of the process of scientific change.1
Related Topics
References
- ^ Rawleigh, William. (2018) The Status of Questions in the Ontology of Scientific Change. Scientonomy 2, 1-12. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/29651.