Journal of Scientonomy
The field-defining journal of Scientonomy offers research that deepens our understanding of the process of scientific change. The underlying idea of the journal is that scientific change is a law-governed process and that it is best studied in a piecemeal theory-guided fashion. It is an integral part of the scientonomic workflow.
The journal publishes works that attempt to accomplish the following:
- seek solutions to topical issues in theoretical scientonomy;
- apply the currently accepted theory to historical cases of scientific change;
- engage in a philosophical analysis of the key concepts of scientonomy.
Any research paper published in the journal comes with an explicitly formulated list of suggested modifications. These modifications are documented in this encyclopedia and are then evaluated by scientonomic community.
The journal uses the Open Access publishing model and is freely available online at www.scientojournal.com.
The journal of Scientonomy was established in 2016 by the scientonomy community.
ArticlesThe following is the list of articles published in the journal:
|Citation Key||Year||Citation Text|
|Shaw and Barseghyan (2019)||2019||Shaw, Jamie and Barseghyan, Hakob. (2019) Problems and Prospects with the Scientonomic Workflow. Scientonomy 3, 1-14.|
|Mercuri and Barseghyan (2019)||2019||Mercuri, Mathew and Barseghyan, Hakob. (2019) Method Hierarchies in Clinical Epidemiology. Scientonomy 3, forthcoming.|
|Fraser and Sarwar (2018)||2018||Fraser, Patrick and Sarwar, Ameer. (2018) A Compatibility Law and the Classification of Theory Change. Scientonomy 2, 67-82. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/31278.|
|Sarwar and Fraser (2018)||2018||Sarwar, Ameer and Fraser, Patrick. (2018) Scientificity and The Law of Theory Demarcation. Scientonomy 2, 55-66. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/31275.|
|Mirkin (2018)||2018||Mirkin, Maxim. (2018) The Status of Technological Knowledge in the Scientific Mosaic. Scientonomy 2, 39-53. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/29645.|
|Barseghyan (2018)||2018||Barseghyan, Hakob. (2018) Redrafting the Ontology of Scientific Change. Scientonomy 2, 13-38. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/31032.|
|Rawleigh (2018)||2018||Rawleigh, William. (2018) The Status of Questions in the Ontology of Scientific Change. Scientonomy 2, 1-12. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/29651.|
|Overgaard (2017)||2017||Overgaard, Nicholas. (2017) A Taxonomy for the Social Agents of Scientific Change. Scientonomy 1, 55-62. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/28234.|
|Loiselle (2017)||2017||Loiselle, Mirka. (2017) Multiple Authority Delegation in Art Authentication. Scientonomy 1, 41-53. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/28233.|
|Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan (2017)||2017||Patton, Paul; Overgaard, Nicholas and Barseghyan, Hakob. (2017) Reformulating the Second Law. Scientonomy 1, 29-39. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/27158.|
|Fatigati (2017)||2017||Fatigati, Michael. (2017) A Method for Reconstructing the Medieval Arabic Scientific Mosaic. Scientonomy 1, 19-28. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/27761.|
|Overgaard and Loiselle (2016)||2016||Overgaard, Nicholas and Loiselle, Mirka. (2016) Authority Delegation. Scientonomy 1, 11-18. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/27065.|
|Sebastien (2016)||2016||Sebastien, Zoe. (2016) The Status of Normative Propositions in the Theory of Scientific Change. Scientonomy 1, 1-9. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/26947.|
Hakob Barseghyan (100.0%)