Disjointness of Scientific Mosaic
Revision as of 19:20, 10 February 2023 by Hakob Barseghyan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Ontological Topic |Term=Scientific Mosaic |Ontological Question Type=Disjointness |Description= |Prehistory= |History= |Current View= |Page Status=Stub |Editor Notes= }}")
What other classes is the class of scientific mosaic disjoint with, i.e. classes that don't share any instances with scientific mosaic?
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. There are currently no classes accepted as disjoint with Scientific Mosaic in Scientonomy.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record of the Question
Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 1 January 2016 | The question of Disjointness of Scientific Mosaic became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of Scientific Mosaic. This is when the community accepted its first definition of the term, Scientific Mosaic (Barseghyan-2015), which indicates that the question is itself considered legitimate. | Yes |
All Direct Answers
No answer to this question has been added to the encyclopedia.
If a theory stating the disjointness of scientific mosaic with other classes is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Direct Answers
According to our records, no direct answer to this question has ever been accepted.
Suggested Modifications
According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications concerning a direct answer to this question.
Current View
In Scientonomy, no classes are currently accepted as disjoint with Scientific Mosaic.