Difference between revisions of "Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Acceptance Use and Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
service=youtube | service=youtube | ||
|id=MZ2AjYYHfrw | |id=MZ2AjYYHfrw | ||
| − | |urlargs=start= | + | |urlargs=start=122 |
|alignment=right | |alignment=right | ||
|description=The distinction between acceptance, use, and pursuit explained by Hakob Barseghyan | |description=The distinction between acceptance, use, and pursuit explained by Hakob Barseghyan | ||
Revision as of 13:40, 27 June 2017
that states ""
Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Acceptance Use and Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015) was formulated by in .
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
This theory has never been accepted.
Question Answered
Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Acceptance Use and Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015) is an attempt to answer the following question:
See for more details.
Description
There are three distinct stances that one can take towards a theory:
- acceptance: one can take the theory as the best available description of its object;
- use: one can take the theory as a useful tool for practical applications;
- pursuit: one can take the theory as worthy of further elaboration.
Reasons
No reasons are indicated for this theory.
If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.
Questions About This Theory
There are no higher-order questions concerning this theory.
If a question about this theory is missing, please add it here.
