What does it mean to say that a theory is accepted? How should theory acceptance be defined?
One of the tasks of scientonomy is to explain transitions from one accepted theory to the next. Thus, acceptance is a key concept in current scientonomy. Traditionally, the terms acceptance, use, and pursuit have not been distinguished. Confusion between the three terms leads to serious misunderstanding, thus their clarification is of great importance. 1
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. Theory Acceptance (Sebastien-2016) is currently accepted by Scientonomy community as the best available definition of the term. Theory Acceptance (Sebastien-2016) states "A theory is said to be accepted if it is taken as the best available description or prescription of its object."
The original definition of the term was suggested by Hakob Barseghyan in The Laws of Scientific Change.1 After the inclusion of normative propositions into the elements of scientific change by Zoe Sebastien, the definition was changed to apply not only to descriptive but also to normative propositions.2
|Community||Accepted From||Acceptance Indicators||Still Accepted||Accepted Until||Rejection Indicators|
|Scientonomy||1 January 2016||This is when the community accepted its first definition of the term, Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015), which indicates that the question is itself considered legitimate.||Yes|
|Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015)||A theory is said to be accepted if it is taken as the best available description of its object.||2015|
|Theory Acceptance (Sebastien-2016)||A theory is said to be accepted if it is taken as the best available description or prescription of its object.||2016|
|Community||Theory||Accepted From||Accepted Until|
|Scientonomy||Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015)||1 January 2016||15 February 2017|
|Scientonomy||Theory Acceptance (Sebastien-2016)||15 February 2017|
|Modification||Community||Date Suggested||Summary||Verdict||Verdict Rationale||Date Assessed|
|Sciento-2016-0002||Scientonomy||3 September 2016||Accept a new taxonomy for theory, normative theory, descriptive theory to reintroduce normative propositions (such as those of ethics or methodology) to the scientific mosaic.||Not Accepted||Since this modification consisted of two interrelated but essentially distinct suggestions - one definitional and one ontological - it was decided by the community to divide it into two modifications so that the gist of the proposed suggestions is properly articulated. In particular, it was agreed that there are two modifications in "the heart of this single modification - one ontological, the other definitional".c1 It was also agreed that the current formulation "is exclusively definitional, and does not give the community an opportunity to appreciate (and, well, accept) the ontological changes that come along with it".c2 Consequently, it was decided to divide this modification into two modifications - one definitional and one ontological.c3||23 January 2017|
|Sciento-2017-0002||Scientonomy||23 January 2017||Accept a new ontology of scientific change where the two fundamental elements are theories - both descriptive and normative - and methods.||Accepted||The community has agreed that after the solution of the paradox of normative propositions, there are no obstacles for including normative propositions into the ontology of scientific change.c1 c2 c3 It was also agreed that including normative propositions into the ontology of scientific change "would allow us to grasp the role that methodological and ethical rules play in science".c4||15 February 2017|
In Scientonomy community, the accepted definition of the term is Theory Acceptance (Sebastien-2016). It is defined as: "A theory is said to be accepted if it is taken as the best available description or prescription of its object."
TODO Read More
The following related topic(s) currently lack an accepted answer:
- Anomaly: What is an anomaly? How should it be defined? The topic has no accepted answer in Scientonomy.
It has the following sub-topic(s):
This topic is also related to the following topic(s):
- Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.
- Sebastien, Zoe. (2016) The Status of Normative Propositions in the Theory of Scientific Change. Scientonomy 1, 1-9. Retrieved from http://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/26947.