Epistemic Stance
What is epistemic stance? How should it be defined?
In the scientonomic context, this term was first used by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015. The term is currently accepted by Scientonomy community.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record of the Term
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 1 January 2016 | The term stance became accepted with the inception of the community. | Yes |
All Definitions
Accepted Definitions
Suggested Modifications
Current Definition
While the term is currently lacking an explicit definition, it is roughly understood as the attitude of an epistemic agent towards an epistemic element.
At the moment, the term has no accepted definition in Scientonomy.
Ontology
Existence
In Scientonomy, it is currently accepted that "There is such a thing as an epistemic stance."
Subtypes
In Scientonomy, the accepted subtypes of Epistemic Stance are:
Supertypes
In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted supertypes of Epistemic Stance.
Associations
In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted associations of Epistemic Stance.
Disjointness
In Scientonomy, no classes are currently accepted as disjoint with Epistemic Stance.
If a question concerning the ontology of an epistemic stance is missing, please add it here.
Dynamics
If a question concerning the dynamics of an epistemic stance is missing, please add it here.