Difference between revisions of "Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Acceptance Use and Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, | |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, | ||
|Formulated Year=2015 | |Formulated Year=2015 | ||
| − | |Description= | + | |Description=There are three distinct stances that one can take towards a theory: |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | There are three distinct stances that one can take towards a theory: | ||
* [[Theory Acceptance|acceptance]]: one can take the theory as the best available description of its object; | * [[Theory Acceptance|acceptance]]: one can take the theory as the best available description of its object; | ||
* [[Theory Use|use]]: one can take the theory as a useful tool for practical applications; | * [[Theory Use|use]]: one can take the theory as a useful tool for practical applications; | ||
Revision as of 21:39, 14 March 2018
that states ""
Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Acceptance Use and Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015) was formulated by in .
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
This theory has never been accepted.
Question Answered
Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Acceptance Use and Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015) is an attempt to answer the following question:
See for more details.
Description
There are three distinct stances that one can take towards a theory:
- acceptance: one can take the theory as the best available description of its object;
- use: one can take the theory as a useful tool for practical applications;
- pursuit: one can take the theory as worthy of further elaboration.
Reasons
No reasons are indicated for this theory.
If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.
Questions About This Theory
There are no higher-order questions concerning this theory.
If a question about this theory is missing, please add it here.
