Difference between revisions of "Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Acceptance Use and Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Title=Epistemic Stances - Acceptance Use and Pursuit | |Title=Epistemic Stances - Acceptance Use and Pursuit | ||
|Theory Type=Descriptive | |Theory Type=Descriptive | ||
| + | |Alternate Titles= | ||
|Formulation Text=The list of possible stances towards a theory includes ''acceptance'', ''use'', and ''pursuit''. | |Formulation Text=The list of possible stances towards a theory includes ''acceptance'', ''use'', and ''pursuit''. | ||
| + | |Formulation File= | ||
|Topic=Epistemic Stances Towards Theories | |Topic=Epistemic Stances Towards Theories | ||
| − | |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan | + | |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |
|Formulated Year=2015 | |Formulated Year=2015 | ||
| − | |Description=There are three distinct stances that one can take towards a theory | + | |Description=There are three distinct stances that one can take towards a theory - [[Theory Acceptance|acceptance]], [[Theory Use|use]], and [[Theory Pursuit|pursuit]]. These stances are in principle independent from each other, meaning that one stance one can take any these stances towards a theory without taking the other stances. Thus, all of the following combinations are possible: |
| − | + | * a theory is accepted, used, and pursued at the same time; | |
| − | + | * a theory is accepted and used without being pursued; | |
| − | + | * a theory is accepted and pursued without being used; | |
| + | * a theory is used and pursued without being accepted; | ||
| + | * a theory is only accepted; | ||
| + | * a theory is only used; | ||
| + | * a theory is only pursued; | ||
| + | * a theory is neither accepted, nor used, nor pursued. | ||
|Resource=Barseghyan (2015) | |Resource=Barseghyan (2015) | ||
| + | |Prehistory= | ||
| + | |History= | ||
|Page Status=Stub | |Page Status=Stub | ||
| + | |Editor Notes= | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{YouTube Video | {{YouTube Video | ||
| Line 21: | Line 31: | ||
{{Acceptance Record | {{Acceptance Record | ||
|Community=Community:Scientonomy | |Community=Community:Scientonomy | ||
| − | |||
|Accepted From Year=2016 | |Accepted From Year=2016 | ||
|Accepted From Month=January | |Accepted From Month=January | ||
| Line 28: | Line 37: | ||
|Acceptance Indicators=The distinction became ''de facto'' accepted by the community at that time together with the whole [[The Theory of Scientific Change|theory of scientific change]]. | |Acceptance Indicators=The distinction became ''de facto'' accepted by the community at that time together with the whole [[The Theory of Scientific Change|theory of scientific change]]. | ||
|Still Accepted=Yes | |Still Accepted=Yes | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Era= | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Year= | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Month= | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Day= | ||
|Accepted Until Approximate=No | |Accepted Until Approximate=No | ||
| + | |Rejection Indicators= | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 17:57, 31 May 2020
that states ""
Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Acceptance Use and Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015) was formulated by in .
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
This theory has never been accepted.
Question Answered
Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Acceptance Use and Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015) is an attempt to answer the following question:
See for more details.
Description
There are three distinct stances that one can take towards a theory - acceptance, use, and pursuit. These stances are in principle independent from each other, meaning that one stance one can take any these stances towards a theory without taking the other stances. Thus, all of the following combinations are possible:
- a theory is accepted, used, and pursued at the same time;
- a theory is accepted and used without being pursued;
- a theory is accepted and pursued without being used;
- a theory is used and pursued without being accepted;
- a theory is only accepted;
- a theory is only used;
- a theory is only pursued;
- a theory is neither accepted, nor used, nor pursued.
Reasons
No reasons are indicated for this theory.
If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.
Questions About This Theory
There are no higher-order questions concerning this theory.
If a question about this theory is missing, please add it here.
