Difference between revisions of "Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Scientificity Acceptance Use and Pursuit (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)"

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 6: Line 6:
 
|Authors List=Ameer Sarwar, Patrick Fraser,
 
|Authors List=Ameer Sarwar, Patrick Fraser,
 
|Formulated Year=2018
 
|Formulated Year=2018
|Description=It has been postulated by Sarwar and Fraser[[CiteRef::Sarwar and Fraser (2018)]] that, in addition to the already accepted epistemic stances that an epistemic agent may take towards a theory (i.e. acceptance, use, and pursuit), ''scientificity'' can also be taken as a stance towards theories. In particular, if a theory satisfies the demarcation criteria employed by a particular agent, then that agent considers the theory to be scientific. If a theory does not satisfy the demarcation criteria of a particular agent, that agent takes the theory to be unscientific. If assessment is inconclusive, the theory may be taken to be scientific, unscientific, or there may be an additional possible outcome, as of yet not understood. Sarwar and Fraser demonstrate that communities may consider theories to be scientific or unscientific irrespective of whether or not those theories are accepted, unaccepted, used, unused, pursued, or unpursued. As such, they conclude that it is a distinct epistemic stance.
+
|Description=It is postulated by Sarwar and Fraser that in addition to the already accepted epistemic stances that epistemic agents may take towards theories, ''scientificity'' is a unique and independent stance that agents can also take towards theories.[[CiteRef::Sarwar and Fraser (2018)]] In particular, if a theory satisfies the demarcation criteria employed by a particular agent, then that agent considers the theory to be scientific. If the theory does not satisfy the its demarcation criteria, then the theory is taken to be unscientific. If assessment is inconclusive, the theory may be taken as scientific, unscientific, or uncertain. Sarwar and Fraser argue that scientific communities take the stance of scientificity or unscientificity independent of whether those theories are accepted, unaccepted, used, unused, pursued, or unpursued. As such, scientificity is a distinct epistemic stance.
 
|Resource=Sarwar and Fraser (2018)
 
|Resource=Sarwar and Fraser (2018)
|History=It has been previously recognized that epistemic agents may take a variety of epistemic stances towards theories, including acceptance, use, and pursuit. It has been postulated that scientificity, that is, whether a theory is scientific or unscientific, also constitutes an epistemic stance which may be taken towards theories which is distinct from the other three.[[CiteRef::Sarwar and Fraser (2018)]]
+
|History=It is accepted in scientonomy that epistemic agents may take a variety of epistemic stances towards theories, including ''acceptance'', ''use'', and ''pursuit''. However, it is recognized that this list is by no means exhausitve.
 
|Page Status=Stub
 
|Page Status=Stub
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 05:58, 3 March 2019

that states ""

Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Scientificity Acceptance Use and Pursuit (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) was formulated by in .

Scientonomic History

It is accepted in scientonomy that epistemic agents may take a variety of epistemic stances towards theories, including acceptance, use, and pursuit. However, it is recognized that this list is by no means exhausitve.

Acceptance Record

This theory has never been accepted.

Question Answered

Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Scientificity Acceptance Use and Pursuit (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) is an attempt to answer the following question:

See for more details.

Description

It is postulated by Sarwar and Fraser that in addition to the already accepted epistemic stances that epistemic agents may take towards theories, scientificity is a unique and independent stance that agents can also take towards theories.1 In particular, if a theory satisfies the demarcation criteria employed by a particular agent, then that agent considers the theory to be scientific. If the theory does not satisfy the its demarcation criteria, then the theory is taken to be unscientific. If assessment is inconclusive, the theory may be taken as scientific, unscientific, or uncertain. Sarwar and Fraser argue that scientific communities take the stance of scientificity or unscientificity independent of whether those theories are accepted, unaccepted, used, unused, pursued, or unpursued. As such, scientificity is a distinct epistemic stance.

Reasons

No reasons are indicated for this theory.

If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.

Questions About This Theory

There are no higher-order questions concerning this theory.

If a question about this theory is missing, please add it here.

References

  1. ^  Sarwar, Ameer and Fraser, Patrick. (2018) Scientificity and The Law of Theory Demarcation. Scientonomy 2, 55-66. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/31275.