Difference between revisions of "Giere (2012)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Paul Patton (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Bibliographic Record |Title=History and Philosophy of Science: Thirty Five Years Later |Resource Type=collection article |Author=Ronald Giere, |Year=2012 |Abstract=Giere arg...") |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|Year=2012 | |Year=2012 | ||
|Abstract=Giere argues for a reconciliation between history of science and philosophy of science on the grounds that philosophy of science must become theory of science, that is, a naturalized theory of how science works. Normative claims about how science should work can flow from a descriptive understanding of how it does work. Giere believes that such a theory of science can emerge from melding cognitive science with sociology of science. | |Abstract=Giere argues for a reconciliation between history of science and philosophy of science on the grounds that philosophy of science must become theory of science, that is, a naturalized theory of how science works. Normative claims about how science should work can flow from a descriptive understanding of how it does work. Giere believes that such a theory of science can emerge from melding cognitive science with sociology of science. | ||
− | |Collection=Mauskopf and Schmaltz (2012) | + | |Collection=Mauskopf and Schmaltz (Eds.) (2012) |
|Pages=59-66 | |Pages=59-66 | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 11:00, 21 February 2017
Giere, Ronald. (2012) History and Philosophy of Science: Thirty Five Years Later. In Mauskopf and Schmaltz (Eds.) (2012), 59-66.
Title | History and Philosophy of Science: Thirty Five Years Later |
---|---|
Resource Type | collection article |
Author(s) | Ronald Giere |
Year | 2012 |
Collection | Mauskopf and Schmaltz (Eds.) (2012) |
Pages | 59-66 |
Abstract
Giere argues for a reconciliation between history of science and philosophy of science on the grounds that philosophy of science must become theory of science, that is, a naturalized theory of how science works. Normative claims about how science should work can flow from a descriptive understanding of how it does work. Giere believes that such a theory of science can emerge from melding cognitive science with sociology of science.