Difference between revisions of "Indicators of Question Acceptance"
(→History: This is a normative question, not descriptive) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Topic | {{Topic | ||
| − | |Question=What | + | |Question=What type of historical markers can be taken as indicative that a question was accepted by an agent at a given time? |
| − | |Topic Type= | + | |Topic Type=Normative |
| − | |Description= | + | |Description=As accepted questions change through time, it is important to have methods of establishing that such-and-such a question was accepted as a legitimate topic of inquiry by a certain epistemic agent at a certain time. What are the indicators of question acceptance that observational scientonomists may employ to determine what questions were a part of a mosaic at any given time? An answer to the question of what sorts of evidence are acceptable as indicators of question acceptance is an essential step in enabling observational scientomists to identify which historical markers are relevant in deliberations over what questions were included in past and contemporary mosaics. |
|Authors List=William Rawleigh, | |Authors List=William Rawleigh, | ||
|Formulated Year=2018 | |Formulated Year=2018 | ||
Latest revision as of 16:43, 16 October 2022
What type of historical markers can be taken as indicative that a question was accepted by an agent at a given time?
As accepted questions change through time, it is important to have methods of establishing that such-and-such a question was accepted as a legitimate topic of inquiry by a certain epistemic agent at a certain time. What are the indicators of question acceptance that observational scientonomists may employ to determine what questions were a part of a mosaic at any given time? An answer to the question of what sorts of evidence are acceptable as indicators of question acceptance is an essential step in enabling observational scientomists to identify which historical markers are relevant in deliberations over what questions were included in past and contemporary mosaics.
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by William Rawleigh in 2018. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
| Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scientonomy | 1 November 2018 | The question became accepted accepted as a legitimate topic of scientonomic inquiry as a result of the acceptance of the respective suggested modification. | Yes |
All Theories
If an answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
Suggested Modifications
Current View
There is currently no accepted answer to this question.
Related Topics
This topic is also related to the following topic(s):
