Indicators of Theory Scientificity
Revision as of 22:05, 23 February 2019 by Hakob Barseghyan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Topic |Question=What are the historical indicators of a theory’s scientificity? How can observational scientonomists establish that such-and-such a theory was indeed consi...")
What are the historical indicators of a theory’s scientificity? How can observational scientonomists establish that such-and-such a theory was indeed considered scientific/unscientific by a certain epistemic agent at a certain time?
TODO: Add a description Can traditional indicators like textbooks, encyclopedias, conference proceedings, and journals be used to determine if evaluation by the demarcation criteria took place?
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Patrick Fraser and Ameer Sarwar in 2018.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Our records state that this question has never been accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by any community.
All Theories
According to our records, no theory has attempted to answer this question.
If an answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
According to our records, no theory on this topic has ever been accepted.
Suggested Modifications
According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.
Current View
There is currently no accepted answer to this question.
Related Topics
References
- ^ Wisniak, Jaime. (2004) Phlogiston: The rise and fall of a theory. Indian Journal of Chemical Technology 11 (5), 732-743. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/9538.
