Bureaucrats, Comment administrators, editor, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, Widget editors
11,019
edits
Changes
List of Open Questions (view source)
Revision as of 03:26, 8 September 2016
, 03:26, 8 September 2016no edit summary
* Do fallibilism about science and paraconsistent compatibility criteria entail each other, or could they arise separately?
* Has our criterion of compatibility, which accepts inconsistencies, become vacuous or trivial (Jennifer Whyte, 2016)?
* The TSC states that the choice of relevant facts is guided by our existing theories. Is it also the case that questions/problems in science become relevant because of existing theories? (Nick Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan, 2016)
* Is it possible for a community to say that they do not accept a theory, but in reality they do? In other words, what is the status of ‘tacit knowledge’ in the TSC? Can we find historical cases of situations like this? (Jaqueline Sereda, 2016)