Bureaucrats, Comment administrators, editor, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, Widget editors
11,019
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
List of Open Questions (view source)
Revision as of 03:26, 8 September 2016
, 03:26, 8 September 2016no edit summary
* Do fallibilism about science and paraconsistent compatibility criteria entail each other, or could they arise separately?
* Has our criterion of compatibility, which accepts inconsistencies, become vacuous or trivial (Jennifer Whyte, 2016)?
* The TSC states that the choice of relevant facts is guided by our existing theories. Is it also the case that questions/problems in science become relevant because of existing theories? (Nick Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan, 2016)
* Is it possible for a community to say that they do not accept a theory, but in reality they do? In other words, what is the status of ‘tacit knowledge’ in the TSC? Can we find historical cases of situations like this? (Jaqueline Sereda, 2016)
