Difference between revisions of "Mechanism of Method Employment"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|History=In the context of scientonomy the answer to this question has been traditionally provided by ''the third law''. Until 2016 it was the third law as formulated by [[Hakob Barseghyan]].[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 54]] | |History=In the context of scientonomy the answer to this question has been traditionally provided by ''the third law''. Until 2016 it was the third law as formulated by [[Hakob Barseghyan]].[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 54]] | ||
| − | After the acceptance of [[Zoe Sebastien]]'s [[Modification:2016- | + | After the acceptance of [[Zoe Sebastien]]'s [[Modification:2016-0001|suggested modification]] in 2016, the answer to the question of method employment is provided by Sebastien's formulation of the third law. |
|Related Topics=Mechanism of Theory Acceptance, | |Related Topics=Mechanism of Theory Acceptance, | ||
|Related Theories=The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Third Law (Sebastien-2016), | |Related Theories=The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Third Law (Sebastien-2016), | ||
Revision as of 23:57, 29 August 2016
References
- ^ Laudan (1984)
- ^ McMullin, Ernan. (1988) The Shaping of Scientific Rationality: Construction and Constraint. In McMullin (Ed.) (1988), 1-47.
- a b c Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.
- ^ Sebastien, Zoe. (2016) The Status of Normative Propositions in the Theory of Scientific Change. Scientonomy 1, 1-9. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/26947.
