Difference between revisions of "Mechanism of Method Employment"

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
After the acceptance of [[Zoe Sebastien]]'s [[Modification:2016-0001|suggested modification]] in 2016, the answer to the question of method employment is provided by Sebastien's formulation of the third law.
 
After the acceptance of [[Zoe Sebastien]]'s [[Modification:2016-0001|suggested modification]] in 2016, the answer to the question of method employment is provided by Sebastien's formulation of the third law.
|Related Topics=Mechanism of Theory Acceptance, Epistemic Community,
+
|Related Topics=Mechanism of Theory Acceptance,
 
|Related Theories=The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Third Law (Sebastien-2016),
 
|Related Theories=The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Third Law (Sebastien-2016),
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 12:46, 30 August 2016

References

  1. ^ Laudan (1984) 
  2. ^  McMullin, Ernan. (1988) The Shaping of Scientific Rationality: Construction and Constraint. In McMullin (Ed.) (1988), 1-47.
  3. ^  Lindberg, David. (2007) The Beginnings of Western Science. The European Scientific Tradition in Philosophical, Religious, and Institutional Context, Prehistory to A.D. 1450, Second Edition. University Of Chicago Press.
  4. ^ Kuhn (1962) 
  5. ^  Latour, Bruno and Woolgar, Steve. (1979) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton University Press.
  6. ^  Barnes, Barry; Bloor, David and Henry, John. (1996) Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis. University of Chicago Press.
  7. ^  Feyerabend, Paul. (1975) Against Method. New Left Books.
  8. a b c  Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.
  9. ^  Sebastien, Zoe. (2016) The Status of Normative Propositions in the Theory of Scientific Change. Scientonomy 1, 1-9. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/26947.