Difference between revisions of "Methods and Technical Research Tools"

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 15: Line 15:
 
|Accepted From Day=1
 
|Accepted From Day=1
 
|Accepted From Approximate=No
 
|Accepted From Approximate=No
|Acceptance Indicators=It was acknowledged as an open question by the seminar of 2016.
+
|Acceptance Indicators=It was acknowledged as an open question by the Scientonomy Seminar of 2016]].
 
|Still Accepted=Yes
 
|Still Accepted=Yes
 
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
 
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 16:48, 16 February 2017

What is the relationship between methods and technical research tools?

Whether or not a a technical research tool is used in a particular field depends on the employed method of the time. However, the use of a given tool is not necessarily expressed in the formulation of the method. Is it possible for a technical research tool to exist independent from any method?

In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Paul Patton in 2016. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community.

In Scientonomy, the accepted answer to the question is:

  • Propositional technological knowledge can be accepted and be part of a mosaic.

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
CommunityAccepted FromAcceptance IndicatorsStill AcceptedAccepted UntilRejection Indicators
Scientonomy1 April 2016It was acknowledged as an open question by the Scientonomy Seminar 2016.Yes

All Theories

According to our records, no theory has attempted to answer this question.

If an answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Theories

According to our records, no theory on this topic has ever been accepted.

Suggested Modifications

According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.

Current View

In Scientonomy, the accepted answer to the question is Technological Knowledge as Part of Mosaic (Mirkin-2018).

Status of Technological Knowledge

Technological Knowledge as Part of Mosaic (Mirkin-2018) states: "Propositional technological knowledge can be accepted and be part of a mosaic."

There is accepted propositional technological knowledge which appears to exhibit the same patterns of change as questions, theories, and methods in the natural, social, and formal sciences. Technological theories attempting to describe the construction and operation of artifacts as well as to prescribe their correct mode of operation are not merely used, but also often accepted by epistemic agents. Since technology often involves methods different from those found in science and produces normative propositions, many of which remain tacit, one may be tempted to think that changes in technological knowledge should be somehow exempt from the laws of scientific change. Yet, the discussion of the historical cases of sorting algorithms, telescopes, crop rotation, and colorectal cancer surgeries show that technological theories and methods are often an integral part of an epistemic agent’s mosaic and seem to exhibit the same scientonomic patterns of change typical of accepted theories therein. Thus, propositional technological knowledge can be part of a mosaic.

Related Topics

This question is a subquestion of Status of Technological Knowledge.