Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
{{PrintDiagramFile|diagram file=Authority Delegation Taxonomy (Overgaard-Loiselle-2016).png}}
|To Accept=Mutual Authority Delegation (Overgaard-Loiselle-2016), One-sided Authority Delegation (Overgaard-Loiselle-2016),
|Parent ModificationModifications=Modification:Sciento-2016-0003,|Verdict=Not Accepted|Date Assessed Year=20172018|Date Assessed Month=JanuaryFebruary|Date Assessed Day=182
|Date Assessed Approximate=No
|Verdict Rationale=testFollowing a period of discussion, it was finally agreed that "the current definitions of authority delegation, mutual authority delegation, and one-sided authority delegation, despite their problems, are currently the best available such definitions".<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2016-0004#comment-69|c1]]</sup> It was noted that these definitions don't take into the account the possibility of ''conditional'' authority delegation, where community ''A'' is prepared to accept the findings of another community on a certain topic only if these findings also satisfy some additional criteria imposed by community ''A''. It was argued that there might be cases where a community's reliance on the findings of another community might be "conditional in ways that the current authority delegation definition is too restrictive to encompass".<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2016-0004#comment-37|c2]]</sup> The idea of conditional delegation was found pursuit-worhty.<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2016-0004#comment-68|c3]]</sup> It was also stressed that these definitions are only the first step towards a deeper understanding of the mechanism of authority delegation. Scientonomists were advised to pursue the idea of deducing "theorems concerning theory acceptance and method employment in delegating mosaics".<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2016-0004#comment-24|c4]]</sup>
}}

Navigation menu