Difference between revisions of "Necessary Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Izzy Friesen (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Title=Deduction of the Necessary Mosaic Split Theorem | |Title=Deduction of the Necessary Mosaic Split Theorem | ||
|Premises=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015) | |Premises=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015) | ||
| + | |Formulation Text=The ''necessary mosaic split'' theorem is a deductive consequence of the second law and the zeroth law. | ||
|Diagram File=Necessary-mosaic-split.jpg | |Diagram File=Necessary-mosaic-split.jpg | ||
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan | |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan | ||
|Formulated Year=2015 | |Formulated Year=2015 | ||
| − | |Description=The necessary mosaic split theorem follows as a deductive consequence of the [[The Second Law|second law]] and the zeroth law. Per the zeroth law, two incompatible elements cannot simultaneously remain in a mosaic, and per the second law any theory that satisfies the method of the time (and the assessment of the theory by the method is not inconclusive) is accepted into the mosaic. This creates the apparently contradictory situation where either of the two theories A) must be accepted because it satisfies the employed method and B) must not be accepted because it in not compatible with another accepted theory. | + | |Description=The necessary mosaic split theorem follows as a deductive consequence of the [[The Second Law|second law]] and the zeroth law. Per the zeroth law, two incompatible elements cannot simultaneously remain in a mosaic, and per the second law any theory that satisfies the method of the time (and the assessment of the theory by the method is not inconclusive) is accepted into the mosaic. This creates the apparently contradictory situation where either of the two theories A) must be accepted because it satisfies the employed method and B) must not be accepted because it in not compatible with another accepted theory. |
| + | |||
| + | {{PrintDiagramFile|diagram file=Necessary-mosaic-split.jpg}} | ||
|Resource=Barseghyan (2015) | |Resource=Barseghyan (2015) | ||
|Page Status=Stub | |Page Status=Stub | ||
|Editor Notes= | |Editor Notes= | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:48, 17 January 2024
The necessary mosaic split theorem follows as a deductive consequence of the second law and the zeroth law. Per the zeroth law, two incompatible elements cannot simultaneously remain in a mosaic, and per the second law any theory that satisfies the method of the time (and the assessment of the theory by the method is not inconclusive) is accepted into the mosaic. This creates the apparently contradictory situation where either of the two theories A) must be accepted because it satisfies the employed method and B) must not be accepted because it in not compatible with another accepted theory.
This reason for Necessary Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) was formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015.1
References
- ^ Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.
