Open main menu

Changes

no edit summary
|Topic Type=Descriptive
|Description=How can our accepted scientonomic theories influence the very process they are meant to describe? Specifically, can an acceptance of scientonomy and its becoming part of broad university curricula affect the way scientists do science? If so, wouldn't this be a case of self-fulfilling prophecy, when scientists start acting in accord with the laws of scientonomy even if they weren't doing so prior to learning the laws of scientific change?
|Parent Topic=|Authors List=Ameer Sarwar, Sinan Karamehmetoglu, Hakob Barseghyan,Sinan Karamehmetoglu
|Formulated Year=2018
|Academic Events=Scientonomy Seminar 2018,|Prehistory=|History=|Current View=|Related Topics=Scope of Scientonomy - Descriptive and Normative,
|Page Status=Stub
|Editor Notes=Why normative in the title?
}}
{{Acceptance Record
|Acceptance Indicators=It was acknowledged as an open question by the [[Scientonomy Seminar 2018]].
|Still Accepted=Yes
|Accepted Until Era=
|Accepted Until Year=
|Accepted Until Month=
|Accepted Until Day=
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
|Rejection Indicators=
}}