Difference between revisions of "Possibility of Scientonomy - Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method"
Paul Patton (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Topic |Question=How can there be scientonomy if the methods of science are changeable? |Topic Type=Descriptive |Parent Topic=Possibility of Scientonomy |Authors List=Hakob B...") |
Paul Patton (talk | contribs) m (Paul Patton moved page Possibility of Scientonomy - Argument from Changability of Scientific Method to Possibility of Scientonomy - Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method without leaving a redirect) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Question=How can there be scientonomy if the methods of science are changeable? | |Question=How can there be scientonomy if the methods of science are changeable? | ||
|Topic Type=Descriptive | |Topic Type=Descriptive | ||
| + | |Description=TODO | ||
|Parent Topic=Possibility of Scientonomy | |Parent Topic=Possibility of Scientonomy | ||
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, | |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, | ||
|Formulated Year=2015 | |Formulated Year=2015 | ||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Acceptance Record | {{Acceptance Record | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|Accepted From Day=1 | |Accepted From Day=1 | ||
|Accepted From Approximate=No | |Accepted From Approximate=No | ||
| − | |Acceptance Indicators=This is when the community accepted its first answer to the question, Response to the Argument from | + | |Acceptance Indicators=This is when the community accepted its first answer to the question, [[Response to the Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method (Barseghyan-2015)]], which indicates that the question is itself legitimate. |
|Still Accepted=Yes | |Still Accepted=Yes | ||
|Accepted Until Approximate=No | |Accepted Until Approximate=No | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:53, 5 December 2018
How can there be scientonomy if the methods of science are changeable?
TODO
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community.
In Scientonomy, the accepted answers to the question can be summarized as follows:
- Scientonomy does not postulate the existence of a universal and unchanging method of science; thus the fact that methods of science are changeable is not detrimental to the prospects of scientonomy.
- Scientonomy is possible because the process of scientific change exhibits lawful general regularities.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
| Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scientonomy | 1 January 2016 | This is when the community accepted its first answer to the question, Response to the Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method (Barseghyan-2015), which indicates that the question is itself legitimate. | Yes |
All Theories
| Theory | Formulation | Formulated In |
|---|---|---|
| Response to the Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method (Barseghyan-2015) | Scientonomy does not postulate the existence of a universal and unchanging method of science; thus the fact that methods of science are changeable is not detrimental to the prospects of scientonomy. | 2015 |
If an answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
| Community | Theory | Accepted From | Accepted Until |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scientonomy | Response to the Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method (Barseghyan-2015) | 1 January 2016 |
Suggested Modifications
Current View
In Scientonomy, the accepted answers to the question are Response to the Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method (Barseghyan-2015) and Possibility of Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015).
Response to the Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method (Barseghyan-2015) states: "Scientonomy does not postulate the existence of a universal and unchanging method of science; thus the fact that methods of science are changeable is not detrimental to the prospects of scientonomy."
ToDo
Possibility of Scientonomy
Possibility of Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015) states: "Scientonomy is possible because the process of scientific change exhibits lawful general regularities."
Related Topics
This question is a subquestion of Possibility of Scientonomy.
