Response to the Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method (Barseghyan-2015)

An attempt to answer the question of Possibility of Scientonomy - Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method which states "Scientonomy does not postulate the existence of a universal and unchanging method of science; thus the fact that methods of science are changeable is not detrimental to the prospects of scientonomy."

Response to the Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method was formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015.1 It is currently accepted by Scientonomy community as the best available theory on the subject.

History

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of Response to the Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method (Barseghyan-2015):

Community	Accepted From	Acceptance Indicators	Still Accepted	Accepted Until	Rejection Indicators
Scientonomy	1 January 2016	The theorem became de facto accepted by the community at that time together with the whole theory of scientific change.	Yes

Question Answered

Response to the Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method (Barseghyan-2015) is an attempt to answer the following question: How can there be scientonomy if the methods of science are changeable?

See Possibility of Scientonomy - Argument from Changeability of Scientific Method for more details.

Description

ToDo

References

1. ^ ↑ Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.

Contributors

Paul Patton (100.0%)