Bureaucrats, Comment administrators, editor, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, Widget editors
11,019
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Possible Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015) (view source)
Revision as of 01:52, 15 June 2017
, 01:52, 15 June 2017no edit summary
The obvious starting point for this sort of discussion is [[Thomas Kuhn]], for whom any case of scientific change is merely contingent owing to the nature of scientific revolutions.[[CiteRef::Kuhn (1962)|pp. 146-149]] In terms of the mechanism itself, Kuhn suggested that the actual process of theory choice ultimately comes down to the deliberation of values inherent to scientific endeavors, which together constitute the "shared basis for theory choice".[[CiteRef::Kuhn (1977)|p. 103]] A divergence within the community implies a conflict in the value-assessment that the community has undertaken when deliberating between two theories. In such cases the emergence of two distinct communities with two different sets of theories arises due to the possibility of differing beliefs with regards to values. These debates do not necessarily end in a division in the community, so it is clear that we are still within the domain of contingent divergence of belief.
[[Larry Laudan]] would later take up a model similar to Kuhn's except that Laudan more clearly explicated the role of values within a hierarchy of scientific debate.[[CiteRef::Laudan (19841984a)|ch. 2]] Laudan's proposal was that a community could experience divergence of belief and a split in the community any time there was a disagreement at any level in the hierarchy, though this is not necessarily the case.[[CiteRef::Laudan (19841984a)|p. 46]]
}}
{{Acceptance Record
