Difference between revisions of "Resolution to the Paradox of Normative Propositions (Sebastien-2016)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Title=Resolution to the Paradox of Normative Propositions | |Title=Resolution to the Paradox of Normative Propositions | ||
|Theory Type=Descriptive | |Theory Type=Descriptive | ||
− | |Formulation Text=The new third law resolves the paradox by making it clear that employed methods don't necessarily follow from ''all'' accepted theories, but only from ''some''. | + | |Formulation Text=The new third law resolves the paradox of normative propositions by making it clear that employed methods don't necessarily follow from ''all'' accepted theories, but only from ''some''. |
|Topic=The Paradox of Normative Propositions | |Topic=The Paradox of Normative Propositions | ||
|Authors List=Zoe Sebastien, | |Authors List=Zoe Sebastien, |
Revision as of 04:40, 3 September 2016
References
- ^ Sebastien, Zoe. (2016) The Status of Normative Propositions in the Theory of Scientific Change. Scientonomy 1, 1-9. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/26947.