Response to the Argument from Social Construction (Barseghyan-2015)
This is an answer to the question Possibility of Scientonomy - The Argument from Social Construction that states "Science can be said to be socially constructed in several different senses (e.g. the contingency, nominalist, and reducibility theses). None of these preclude the possibility of scientonomy."
Response to the Argument from Social Construction was formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015.1 It is currently accepted by Scientonomy community as the best available answer to the question.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 1 January 2016 | The theorem became de facto accepted by the community at that time together with the whole theory of scientific change. | Yes |
Question Answered
Response to the Argument from Social Construction (Barseghyan-2015) is an attempt to answer the following question: How is scientonomy possible if science is a social construction?
See Possibility of Scientonomy - The Argument from Social Construction for more details.
Description
ToDo
Reasons
No reasons are indicated for this theory.
If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.
Questions About This Theory
There are no higher-order questions concerning this theory.
If a question about this theory is missing, please add it here.
References
- ^ Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.