From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
|
| (15 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | {{Topic
| + | #REDIRECT [[Existence of Question]] |
| − | |Question=When do questions/problems become relevant in science? Are questions and problems separate entities, or can they be formulated as beliefs?
| |
| − | |Topic Type=Descriptive
| |
| − | |Description=The relevance of certain questions and problems change with the the status of a mosaic. It is important to identify how and when new questions and problems arise, and what guides a community towards any given question or problem. Furthermore, it is important to the field of scientonomy that we identify how these questions become relevant, whether or not they are their own entities, and whether or not they are iterations of the beliefs of a particular society.
| |
| − | |Authors List=Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan,
| |
| − | |Formulated Year=2016
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − | {{Acceptance Record
| |
| − | |Community=Community:Scientonomy
| |
| − | |Accepted From Era=CE
| |
| − | |Accepted From Year=2016
| |
| − | |Accepted From Month=April
| |
| − | |Accepted From Day=1
| |
| − | |Accepted From Approximate=No
| |
| − | |Acceptance Indicators=It was acknowledged as an open question by the seminar of 2016.
| |
| − | |Still Accepted=Yes
| |
| − | |Accepted Until Approximate=No
| |
| − | }}
| |
Latest revision as of 16:13, 21 February 2023
