Difference between revisions of "Tautological Status of The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015)"
(Created page with "{{Topic |Subject=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) |Topic Type=Descriptive |Subfield=Dynamics |Heritable=No |Question Text Formula= |Question Title Formula= |Question=Is the ...") |
|||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
|Page Status=Stub | |Page Status=Stub | ||
|Editor Notes= | |Editor Notes= | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | {{Acceptance Record | ||
+ | |Community=Community:Scientonomy | ||
+ | |Accepted From Era=CE | ||
+ | |Accepted From Year=2016 | ||
+ | |Accepted From Month=January | ||
+ | |Accepted From Day=1 | ||
+ | |Accepted From Approximate=No | ||
+ | |Acceptance Indicators=The question became accepted with the acceptance of the original theory of scientific change. | ||
+ | |Still Accepted=Yes | ||
+ | |Accepted Until Era= | ||
+ | |Accepted Until Year= | ||
+ | |Accepted Until Month= | ||
+ | |Accepted Until Day= | ||
+ | |Accepted Until Approximate=No | ||
+ | |Rejection Indicators= | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 21:32, 19 January 2023
Is the The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) a tautology?
As any law, the second law attempts to forbid certain courses of action, for otherwise it would lack any empirical content and would be a tautology. However, it is not quite clear whether the law in its current formulation can be contradicted by any conceivable situation. So the question is whether the law is tautological or non-tautological, i.e. whether there are circumstances (perhaps the collapse of the society which contains the scientific community) under which the second law can in principle be violated?
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Rory Harder in 2013. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community.
In Scientonomy, the accepted answer to the question is:
- Barseghyan's original second law is tautological.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 1 January 2016 | The question became accepted with the acceptance of the original theory of scientific change. | Yes |
All Theories
Theory | Formulation | Formulated In |
---|---|---|
The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Barseghyan-2015) | Barseghyan's original second law is tautological. | 2015 |
If an answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
Community | Theory | Accepted From | Accepted Until |
---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Barseghyan-2015) | 1 January 2016 |
Suggested Modifications
Current View
In Scientonomy, the accepted answer to the question is The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Barseghyan-2015).
The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Barseghyan-2015) states: "Barseghyan's original second law is tautological."
According to Barseghyan's initial position, "the second law is not a law in the traditional sense, for normally a law is supposed to have some empirical content, i.e. its opposite should be conceivable at least in principle. Obviously, the second law is a tautology, since it follows from the definition of employed method".1
Related Topics
References
- ^ Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.