The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Barseghyan-2015)
This is an answer to the question Tautological Status of The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) that states "Barseghyan's original second law is tautological."
|Community||Accepted From||Acceptance Indicators||Still Accepted||Accepted Until||Rejection Indicators|
|Scientonomy||1 January 2016||The proposition became de facto accepted by the community at that time together with the whole theory of scientific change.||Yes|
The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Barseghyan-2015) is an attempt to theory the following question: Is Barseghyan's original second law a tautology?
See Tautological Status of The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) for more details.
According to Barseghyan's initial position, "the second law is not a law in the traditional sense, for normally a law is supposed to have some empirical content, i.e. its opposite should be conceivable at least in principle. Obviously, the second law is a tautology, since it follows from the definition of employed method".1
No reasons are indicated for this theory.
If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.
Questions About This Theory
There are no higher-order questions concerning this theory.
If a question about this theory is missing, please add it here.
- Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.