Difference between revisions of "Technological Theory"
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Definitional Topic | {{Definitional Topic | ||
− | |Singular Capitalized= | + | |Singular Capitalized=Technological Theory |
|Plural Capitalized=Technological Theories | |Plural Capitalized=Technological Theories | ||
|Singular Lowercase=technological theory | |Singular Lowercase=technological theory | ||
|Plural Lowercase=technological theories | |Plural Lowercase=technological theories | ||
− | |Indefinite Article= | + | |Indefinite Article=none |
|Question=What is '''technological theory'''? How should it be ''defined''? | |Question=What is '''technological theory'''? How should it be ''defined''? | ||
|Description=It is conceivable that technological theories may turn out to be part of the mosaic. So, a proper definition of the term is of great importance. | |Description=It is conceivable that technological theories may turn out to be part of the mosaic. So, a proper definition of the term is of great importance. | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
|Accepted From Approximate=No | |Accepted From Approximate=No | ||
|Acceptance Indicators= | |Acceptance Indicators= | ||
− | |Still Accepted= | + | |Still Accepted=No |
− | |Accepted Until Era= | + | |Accepted Until Era=CE |
− | |Accepted Until Year= | + | |Accepted Until Year=2023 |
− | |Accepted Until Month= | + | |Accepted Until Month=January |
− | |Accepted Until Day= | + | |Accepted Until Day=13 |
|Accepted Until Approximate=No | |Accepted Until Approximate=No | ||
− | |Rejection Indicators= | + | |Rejection Indicators=It was decided during an editorial meeting that we don't need to add any terms for specific fields of inquiry or even large groupings such as Empirical Science, Formal Science, etc. since these are presumably local distinctions. |
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 20:34, 13 January 2023
What is technological theory? How should it be defined?
It is conceivable that technological theories may turn out to be part of the mosaic. So, a proper definition of the term is of great importance.
In the scientonomic context, this term was first used by Paul Patton in 2016.
Contents
Scientonomic History
The question was formulated during the seminar of 2016.
Acceptance Record
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 22 January 2016 | No | 13 January 2023 | It was decided during an editorial meeting that we don't need to add any terms for specific fields of inquiry or even large groupings such as Empirical Science, Formal Science, etc. since these are presumably local distinctions. |
All Theories
Accepted Theories
Suggested Modifications
Current Definition
There is currently no accepted answer to this question.
Ontology
Existence
There is currently no accepted view concerning the existence of technological theories.
Disjointness
No classes are currently accepted as being disjoint with this class.
Subtypes
No classes are currently accepted as subtypes of technological theory.
Supertypes
No classes are currently accepted as supertypes of technological theory.
Associations
No associations of technological theory are currently accepted.
If a question concerning the ontology of technological theory is missing, please add it here.
Dynamics
If a question concerning the dynamics of technological theory is missing, please add it here.
Related Topics
This term is also related to the following topic(s):