Difference between revisions of "The Law of Theory Demarcation is Not a Tautology (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)"

Latest revision as of 23:22, 19 January 2023

Redirect to:

a b Sarwar, Ameer and Fraser, Patrick. (2018) Scientificity and The Law of Theory Demarcation. Scientonomy 2, 55-66. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/31275.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{Theory
+#REDIRECT: [[The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) is Not Tautological (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)]]
-|Title=The Law of Theory Demarcation is Not a Tautology
-|Theory Type=Descriptive
-|Formulation Text=The law of theory demarcation is ''not'' a tautology.
-|Topic=Tautological Status of the Law of Theory Demarcation
-|Authors List=Ameer Sarwar, Patrick Fraser,
-|Formulated Year=2018
-|Description=[[The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)|The law of theory demarcation]] is not a tautology, because it is in principle violable, i.e. it forbids certain logical possibilities.[[CiteRef::Sarwar and Fraser (2018)]] In particular, if the assessment outcomes by the demarcation criteria are conclusively satisfied, then it is impossible for the theory's status to be ''unscientific'' or ''uncertain''. Similarly, if a theory conclusively fails to satisfy the demarcation criteria employed by an epistemic agent, then it is impossible for the theory to be considered ''scientific'' or ''uncertain''. Given the prohibition of these four possibilities, the law of theory demarcation is not tautological.
-|Resource=Sarwar and Fraser (2018)
-|Page Status=Stub
-}}