Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
{{Theory
|TitleTopic=Tautological Status of The Second Law is a Tautology(Barseghyan-2015)
|Theory Type=Descriptive
|Formulation TextSubject=The second law Second Law (Barseghyan-2015)|Predicate=is a tautology.tautological|TopicTitle=Tautological Status of The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015)is Tautological|Alternate Titles=|Title Formula=|Text Formula=|Object=Tautological|Formulation Text=
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,
|Formulated Year=2015
|Formulation File=
|Description=According to Barseghyan's initial position, "the second law is not a law in the traditional sense, for normally a law is supposed to have some empirical content, i.e. its opposite should be conceivable at least in principle. Obviously, the second law is a ''tautology'', since it follows from the definition of ''employed method''".[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 129, footnote]]
|Resource=Barseghyan (2015)
|Prehistory=|History=|Page Status=Needs EditingEditor Approved|Editor Notes=
}}
{{Acceptance Record
|Accepted From Approximate=No
|Acceptance Indicators=The proposition became ''de facto'' accepted by the community at that time together with the whole [[The Theory of Scientific Change|theory of scientific change]].
|Still Accepted=NoYes|Accepted Until Era=CE|Accepted Until Year=2017|Accepted Until Month=November|Accepted Until Day=29
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
|Rejection Indicators=The proposition became rejected as a result of the acceptance of [[Modification:Sciento-2017-0005|the respective modification]].
}}

Navigation menu