Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
• Currently, the Necessary Element theorem states that the method “only accept the best available theories” is a necessary element for any mosaic. Are there any necessary theories in addition to this method? It seems as though there must be some necessary analytic theories, because any scientific enterprise assumes a whole network of analytic propositions. Are there any necessary synthetic propositions? If so, this could mean that synthetic a priori knowledge is possible. (Hakob Barseghyan, 2016)
• Is there any connection between accepted methodology and theory pursuit? For example, string theory currently cannot be falsified, which goes against the falsificationist methodology widely accepted in the physics community. It is not given much funding by comparison with other pursued theories. (Jennifer Whyte, Jacob MacKinnon, Hakob Barseghyan, 2016) • Can there be delegation authority to tools, or other material objects? Imagine Suppose a community which takes all of its scientific knowledge from an ancient manuscript. Is the community delegating authority to the long-dead writers of this manuscript, or to the book itself? When scientists use an instrument in an experiment, who are they delegating authority to? Standard research practice says that when using an instrument in an experiment, the scientist should cite the manufacturers of the instrument in their research paper. Does this indicate that authority is being delegated to the manufacturers rather than the tool itself? If authority can be delegated to a material object, does this mean that the object is the bearer of a mosaic? (Nick Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan, 2016)
|Resource=Barseghyan (2015)
|Prehistory====Ludwig Fleck 'Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact' 1935===
2,020

edits

Navigation menu