Disjointness of Local Action Availability
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
What other classes is the class of local action availability disjoint with, i.e. classes that don't share any instances with local action availability?
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Joshua Allen in 2023. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. There are currently no classes accepted as disjoint with Local Action Availability in Scientonomy.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record of the Question
Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
| Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scientonomy | 31 December 2023 | The question of Disjointness of Local Action Availability became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of Local Action Availability. This is when the first definition of the term was suggested, indicating that the term itself is accepted. | Yes |
All Direct Answers
No answer to this question has been added to the encyclopedia.
If a theory stating the disjointness of local action availability with other classes is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Direct Answers
According to our records, no direct answer to this question has ever been accepted.
Suggested Modifications
According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications concerning a direct answer to this question.
Current View
In Scientonomy, no classes are currently accepted as disjoint with Local Action Availability.
