Local Action Availability
What is local action availability? How should it be defined?
As local epistemic actions are said to be available to some epistemic agents, it is important to define what this availability amounts to.
In the scientonomic context, this term was first used by Joshua Allen in 2023. The term is currently accepted by Scientonomy community.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record of the Term
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 31 December 2023 | This is when the first definition of the term was suggested, indicating that the term itself is accepted. | Yes |
All Definitions
Theory | Formulation | Formulated In |
---|---|---|
Local Action Availability (Allen-2023) | A local action A is said to be available to an epistemic agent iff that agent employs the norm “A is permissible/desirable”. | 2023 |
Accepted Definitions
Suggested Modifications
Modification | Community | Date Suggested | Summary | Date Assessed | Verdict | Verdict Rationale |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sciento-2023-0007 | Scientonomy | 31 December 2023 | Accept that the a local action A is said to be available to an epistemic agent iff that agent employs the norm “A is permissible/desirable”. Also accept the theorem of local action availability as a deductive consequence of this definition and the law of norm employment: a local epistemic action becomes available to an agent only when its permissibility/desirability is derivable from a non-empty subset of other elements of the agent’s mosaic. | Open | The modification can only become accepted once modification Sciento-2023-0006 becomes accepted. |
Current Definition
At the moment, the term has no accepted definition in Scientonomy.
Ontology
Existence
In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted claims concerning the existence of Local Action Availability.
Subtypes
In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted subtypes of Local Action Availability.
Supertypes
In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted supertypes of Local Action Availability.
Associations
In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted associations of Local Action Availability.
Disjointness
In Scientonomy, no classes are currently accepted as disjoint with Local Action Availability.
If a question concerning the ontology of local action availability is missing, please add it here.
Dynamics
If a question concerning the dynamics of local action availability is missing, please add it here.