Epistemic Stances Towards Questions
What epistemic stances can be taken towards a question?
What are the types of stances that epistemic agents can take towards questions? For instance, can questions be accepted, used, pursued, employed, etc.?
In addition if it is possible to pursuit questions, would this be reducible to theory pursuit or vice versa? If both can be pursued, do they overlap? If they overlap completely, would the question of question pursuit be redundant?
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by William Rawleigh and Intishar Kazi in 2018. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. At the moment, the question has no accepted answer in Scientonomy.
Contents
History
Acceptance Record
| Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scientonomy | 26 September 2018 | The acceptance of questions as a distinct element of the scientonomic ontology indicates that the question of epistemic stances that can be taken towards questions became accepted. | Yes |
All Theories
| Theory | Formulation | Formulated In |
|---|---|---|
| Epistemic Stances Towards Questions - Acceptance (Rawleigh-2018) | The epistemic stance that can be taken by an epistemic agent towards a question is question acceptance. | 2018 |
Accepted Theories
Suggested Modifications
| Modification | Community | Date Suggested | Summary | Verdict | Verdict Rationale | Date Assessed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sciento-2018-0003 | Scientonomy | 12 May 2018 | Accept that the epistemic stance that can be taken by an epistemic agent towards a question is question acceptance (the opposite is unacceptance), where question acceptance is defined as "a question is said to be accepted if it is taken as a legitimate topic of inquiry". | Accepted | It was noted that "the whole point of adding questions to the ontology of epistemic elements was that we can legitimately speak of a question being accepted by a certain agent at a certain time".c1 The discussion also revealed a need to distinguish distinguish "a situation where no consensus exists from a situation where a consensus exists that a question is illegitimate".c2 In other words, "just as question acceptance, theory acceptance too seems to allow for three values: (clearly) accepted; (clearly) unaccepted; no consensus".c3 Thus, a new question was suggested concerning the binary character of epistemic stances: "are all epistemic stances binary, or do they allow for more than two values?"c4 | 1 November 2018 |
Current View
There is currently no accepted answer to this question.
Related Topics
This topic is a sub-topic of Epistemic Stances.
It has the following sub-topic(s):
This topic is also related to the following topic(s):
Contributors
Sinan Karamehmetoglu (34.0%), Hakob Barseghyan (66.0%)
