Explicit

What is explicit knowledge? How should it be defined?

The distinction between explicit and implicit/tacit has played a prominent role in the discussions concerning scientific change, including scientonomic discourse. As such, having a clear definition of what explicit means is an important task.

In the scientonomic context, this term was first used by Hakob Barseghyan and Maxim Mirkin in 2018. The term is currently accepted by Scientonomy community.

In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is:

• Propositional knowledge that has been openly formulated by the agent.

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record of the Term

Here is the complete acceptance record of this term (it includes all the instances when the term was accepted as a part of a community's taxonomy):

Community	Accepted From	Acceptance Indicators	Still Accepted	Accepted Until	Rejection Indicators
Scientonomy	28 December 2018	The publication of Maxim Mirkin's The Status of Technological Knowledge in the Scientific Mosaic is an indication of the acceptance of the term by the community.	Yes

All Definitions

The following definitions of explicit the term have been suggested:

Theory	Formulation	Formulated In
Explicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018)	Propositional knowledge that has been openly formulated by the agent.	2018

If a definition of this term is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Definitions

The following definitions of explicit have been accepted:

Community	Theory	Formulation	Accepted From	Accepted Until
Scientonomy	Explicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018)	Propositional knowledge that has been openly formulated by the agent.	1 September 2019

Suggested Modifications

Here is a list of modifications concerning the definitions of explicit:

Modification	Community	Date Suggested	Summary	Date Assessed	Verdict	Verdict Rationale
Sciento-2018-0011	Scientonomy	28 December 2018	Accept the three-fold distinction between explicit, explicable-implicit, and inexplicable.	1 September 2019	Accepted	The consensus on this modification emerged primarily off-line. It was agreed that "the modification should be accepted".c1 It was also agreed "that the three-fold distinction is to be accepted as it introduces a distinction between explicable-implicit and inexplicable and thus contributes to the clarity of discussions concerning implicit and explicit."c2

Current Definition

In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is Explicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018).

Explicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018) states: "Propositional knowledge that has been openly formulated by the agent."

According to this definition, knowledge is said to be explicit if it has been openly formulated by the agent in question. As such the notion of explicit is agent-relative. The definition was first suggested by Hakob Barseghyan and Maxim Mirkin in their The Role of Technological Knowledge in Scientific Change1 and was restated by Mirkin in his The Status of Technological Knowledge in the Scientific Mosaic.

Ontology

Subtypes

In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted subtypes of Explicit.

Supertypes

In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted supertypes of Explicit.

Disjointness

In Scientonomy, no classes are currently accepted as disjoint with Explicit.

If a question concerning the ontology of explicit is missing, please add it here.

Dynamics

If a question concerning the dynamics of explicit is missing, please add it here.