Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes from Acceptance or Unacceptance of Two Contenders (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)
This is an answer to the question Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes that states "There is a series of inferences that can be made from the acceptance or unacceptance of two contender theories."
Suggestions To Accept
Here are all the modifications where the acceptance of this theory has been suggested:
|5 February 2017
|Accept the following set of inferences of theory assessment outcomes from the acceptance or unacceptance of a single contender and two contenders.
Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes from Acceptance or Unacceptance of Two Contenders (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) is an attempt to answer the following question: What can an observational scientonomist infer about a theory's assessment outcome from the theory's acceptance/unacceptance?
See Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes for more details.
The following inferences can be drawn regarding theory assessment outcomes from the acceptance or unacceptance of two contender theories:
No reasons are indicated for this theory.
If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.
Questions About This Theory
There are no higher-order questions concerning this theory.
If a question about this theory is missing, please add it here.
- Patton, Paul; Overgaard, Nicholas and Barseghyan, Hakob. (2017) Reformulating the Second Law. Scientonomy 1, 29-39. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/27158.