Possibility of Scientonomy - Argument from Bad Track Record

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search

How is scientonomy possible given the bad track record of previous attempts to create a general theory of scientific change?

In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community.

In Scientonomy, the accepted answer to the question is:

  • The failures of past theories of scientific change do not imply the inevitability of future failure or that the enterprise in inherently unsound.

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record of the Question

Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
CommunityAccepted FromAcceptance IndicatorsStill AcceptedAccepted UntilRejection Indicators
Scientonomy1 January 2016This is when the community accepted its first answer to the question, Response to the Argument from Bad Track Record (Barseghyan-2015), which indicates that the question is itself legitimate.Yes

All Direct Answers

The following direct answers to the question have been suggested:
TheoryFormulationFormulated In
Response to the Argument from Bad Track Record (Barseghyan-2015)The failures of past theories of scientific change do not imply the inevitability of future failure or that the enterprise in inherently unsound.2015

If a direct answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Direct Answers

The following theories have been accepted as direct answers to this question:
CommunityTheoryFormulationAccepted FromAccepted Until
ScientonomyResponse to the Argument from Bad Track Record (Barseghyan-2015)The failures of past theories of scientific change do not imply the inevitability of future failure or that the enterprise in inherently unsound.1 January 2016

Suggested Modifications

There have been no suggested modifications concerning direct answers to this question.

Current View

In Scientonomy, the accepted answer to the question is Response to the Argument from Bad Track Record (Barseghyan-2015).

Response to the Argument from Bad Track Record (Barseghyan-2015) states: "The failures of past theories of scientific change do not imply the inevitability of future failure or that the enterprise in inherently unsound."

XXXX

Related Topics

This question is a subquestion of Possibility of Scientonomy.