Response to the Argument from Bad Track Record (Barseghyan-2015)
This is an answer to the question Possibility of Scientonomy - Argument from Bad Track Record that states "The failures of past theories of scientific change do not imply the inevitability of future failure or that the enterprise in inherently unsound."
Response to the Argument from Bad Track Record was formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015.1 It is currently accepted by Scientonomy community as the best available answer to the question.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 1 January 2016 | The theorem became de facto accepted by the community at that time together with the whole theory of scientific change. | Yes |
Question Answered
Response to the Argument from Bad Track Record (Barseghyan-2015) is an attempt to answer the following question: How is scientonomy possible given the bad track record of previous attempts to create a general theory of scientific change?
See Possibility of Scientonomy - Argument from Bad Track Record for more details.
Description
XXXX
Reasons
No reasons are indicated for this theory.
If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.
Questions About This Theory
There are no higher-order questions concerning this theory.
If a question about this theory is missing, please add it here.
References
- ^ Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.