Scope of Scientonomy - All Fields (Barseghyan-2015)
This is an answer to the question Scope of Scientonomy - Time Fields and Scale that states "Scientonomy should account for all changes to the scientific mosaic, regardless of which fields of inquiry they concern."
|Community||Accepted From||Acceptance Indicators||Still Accepted||Accepted Until||Rejection Indicators|
|Scientonomy||1 January 2016||The theory was introduced by Barseghyan in The Laws of Scientific Change pp. 61-72 and became de facto accepted by the community at that time together with the whole theory of scientific change.||Yes|
Scope of Scientonomy - All Fields (Barseghyan-2015) is an attempt to theory the following question: For changes in the mosaic of what time period ought a scientonomic theory account? For changes in which fields of inquiry ought it to account? Ought it deal only in grand changes, or should it account for minor changes as well?
See Scope of Scientonomy - Time Fields and Scale for more details.
It is a task of scientonomy to trace and explain all changes in a mosaic, regardless of which field (discipline) the change concerns. This applies to all fields of inquiry considered scientific by the respective community. For instance, if theology or astrology were parts of the mosaic under study, then a transition from one accepted theological or astrological theory to another during that time period should be explained by scientonomy.
No reasons are indicated for this theory.
If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.
Questions About This Theory
There are no higher-order questions concerning this theory.
If a question about this theory is missing, please add it here.
- Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.