Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
{{Theory
|Topic=Tautological Status of The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015)
|Theory Type=Descriptive
|Subject=
|Predicate=
|Title=The Second Law is a Tautology
|Theory TypeAlternate Titles=|Title Formula=Descriptive|Formulation TextFormula=The second law is a tautology.|TopicObject=Tautological Status of The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015)
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,
|Formulated Year=2015
|Formulation File=
|Description=According to Barseghyan's initial position, "the second law is not a law in the traditional sense, for normally a law is supposed to have some empirical content, i.e. its opposite should be conceivable at least in principle. Obviously, the second law is a ''tautology'', since it follows from the definition of ''employed method''".[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 129, footnote]]
|Resource=Barseghyan (2015)
|Prehistory=
|History=
|Page Status=Needs Editing
|Editor Notes=
|Formulation Text=The second law is a tautology.
}}
{{Acceptance Record

Navigation menu