Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
234 bytes added ,  04:26, 5 September 2016
no edit summary
{{Topic
|Question=What is '''scientific mosaic'''? How should it be ''defined''?
|Topic Type=Definitional
|Question=What is '''scientific mosaic'''? How should it be ''defined''?
|Description=''Scientific mosaic'' is one of the key concepts in current scientonomy. Thus, its proper definition is of great importance.
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,
|Formulated Year=2015
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,
|Prehistory=Although almost all of the great philosophers of science of the 20th century have described the history of science in terms of a changing, systematic collection of beliefs, there has never been a real consensus in the language used to describe such a collection. [[Thomas Kuhn]] used the word ''paradigm'' to talk of integrated collections of theories, methods, and values that were replaced during episodes of revolutionary scientific change.[[CiteRef::Bird (2011)]][[CiteRef::Kuhn (1962)]][[Imre Lakatos]] described a set of propositions as fitting into a scientific “research programme”[[CiteRef::Lakatos (1978a)]]; [[Larry Laudan]] used the concept of ''research tradition''.[[CiteRef::Matheson and Dallmann (2015)]][[CiteRef::Laudan (1984)]] Richard DeWitt talks of “worldviews” to describe the beliefs held by a scientific community at any given time.[[CiteRef::DeWitt (2010)|p. 7]]
While it is not included in the definition, it is understood that the bearer of a mosaic is a [[Scientific Community|scientific community]].[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. xi]] The reason for this omission is that there is currently no accepted definition of "scientific community".
|Related Topics=Scientific Change, Theory, Method, Mechanism of Scientific Change,
}}
{{Acceptance Record
|Community=Community:Scientonomy
|Accepted From Era=CE
|Accepted From Year=2016
|Accepted From Month=January
|Accepted From Day=1
|Accepted From Approximate=No
|Still Accepted=Yes
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
}}

Navigation menu