Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
442 bytes added ,  18:47, 23 September 2016
no edit summary
|Question=What is the nature of '''theory appraisal'''? Does actual '''theory assessment''' concern an individual theory taken in isolation from other theories?
|Topic Type=Descriptive
|Description='''Theory appraisal''' refers to how we assess two competing theories a theory to determine which one whether to acceptit. In appraising any From ancient times up until the mid-twentieth century, it was widely supposed that theories were appraised in isolation from one another; a position known as '''absolute appraisal'''. Once fallibilism became widely accepted, it was suggested instead that theory it must be considered appraisal is a '''comparative''' matter, in which the context relative merits of its competing theories were assessed. '''Contextual appraisal''' contends that a theory is assessed only in relation to the entire mosaicof accepted theories and employed methods. Several For the historian, several elements must be considered in order to avoid committing anachronisms.
|Parent Topic=Mechanism of Theory Acceptance
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,
2,020

edits

Navigation menu