Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
29 bytes added ,  17:11, 30 November 2016
no edit summary
John Norton also gave his own argument known as the Gap Argument. This argument stated that to date, there is no evidence that can determine the content of a scientific theory. However since there is universal agreement on the content of scientific theories, then there is a gap where some agreements cannot be explained by evidence. This seems to undermine the under determination thesis [[CiteRef::Okasha, de Regt, and Hartmann (Eds.) (2009)]]
|Page Status=Editor Approved
}}

Navigation menu