Difference between revisions of "Explicable-Implicit"
(Created page with "{{Topic |Question=What is '''explicable-implicit''' knowledge? How should it be ''defined''? |Topic Type=Definitional |Description=There seem to be implicit knowledge that is...") |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{Topic | + | {{Definitional Topic |
|Question=What is '''explicable-implicit''' knowledge? How should it be ''defined''? | |Question=What is '''explicable-implicit''' knowledge? How should it be ''defined''? | ||
− | |||
|Description=There seem to be implicit knowledge that is capable of being explicitly formulated. The definition of explicable-implicit is meant to capture that category. | |Description=There seem to be implicit knowledge that is capable of being explicitly formulated. The definition of explicable-implicit is meant to capture that category. | ||
|Authors List=Maxim Mirkin, Hakob Barseghyan, | |Authors List=Maxim Mirkin, Hakob Barseghyan, |
Latest revision as of 20:34, 11 December 2022
What is explicable-implicit knowledge? How should it be defined?
There seem to be implicit knowledge that is capable of being explicitly formulated. The definition of explicable-implicit is meant to capture that category.
In the scientonomic context, this term was first used by Hakob Barseghyan and Maxim Mirkin in 2018. The term is currently accepted by Scientonomy community.
In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is:
- Propositional knowledge that hasn’t been openly formulated by the agent.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 28 December 2018 | The publication of Maxim Mirkin's The Status of Technological Knowledge in the Scientific Mosaic is an indication of the acceptance of the term by the community. | Yes |
All Theories
Theory | Formulation | Formulated In |
---|---|---|
Explicable-Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018) | Propositional knowledge that hasn’t been openly formulated by the agent. | 2018 |
Accepted Theories
Community | Theory | Accepted From | Accepted Until |
---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | Explicable-Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018) | 1 September 2019 |
Suggested Modifications
Modification | Community | Date Suggested | Summary | Verdict | Verdict Rationale | Date Assessed |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sciento-2018-0011 | Scientonomy | 28 December 2018 | Accept the three-fold distinction between explicit, explicable-implicit, and inexplicable. | Accepted | The consensus on this modification emerged primarily off-line. It was agreed that "the modification should be accepted".c1 It was also agreed "that the three-fold distinction is to be accepted as it introduces a distinction between explicable-implicit and inexplicable and thus contributes to the clarity of discussions concerning implicit and explicit."c2 | 1 September 2019 |
Current Definition
In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is Explicable-Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018).
Explicable-Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018) states: "Propositional knowledge that hasn’t been openly formulated by the agent."
This category encompasses that knowledge which hasn't been openly formulated by the agent but can, in principle, be open formulated. As such the category is agent-relative. The definition was first suggested by Hakob Barseghyan and Maxim Mirkin in their The Role of Technological Knowledge in Scientific Change1 and was restated by Mirkin in his The Status of Technological Knowledge in the Scientific Mosaic.
Ontology
Existence
There is currently no accepted view concerning the existence of explicable-implicits.
Disjointness
In Scientonomy, no classes are currently accepted as disjoint with Explicable-Implicit.
Subtypes
No classes are currently accepted as subtypes of an explicable-implicit.
Supertypes
No classes are currently accepted as supertypes of an explicable-implicit.
Associations
No associations of an explicable-implicit are currently accepted.
If a question concerning the ontology of an explicable-implicit is missing, please add it here.
Dynamics
If a question concerning the dynamics of an explicable-implicit is missing, please add it here.
References
- ^ Barseghyan, Hakob and Mirkin, Maxim. (2019) The Role of Technological Knowledge in Scientific Change. In Héder and Nádasi (Eds.) (2019), 5-17.