Difference between revisions of "Mechanism of Discipline Rejection"
Paul Patton (talk | contribs) |
Paul Patton (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|History= | |History= | ||
|Current View= | |Current View= | ||
− | |Related Topics=Discipline, Discipline Acceptance, Mechanism of Discipline Acceptance | + | |Related Topics=Discipline, Discipline Acceptance, Mechanism of Discipline Acceptance, Mechanism of Question Rejection, Mechanism of Theory Rejection |
|Page Status=Stub | |Page Status=Stub | ||
|Editor Notes= | |Editor Notes= | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 19:51, 3 August 2021
What is the mechanism of discipline rejection? How do disciplines become rejected?
The discipline of astrology was an accepted part of early modern science, but is no longer a part of science today. Alchemy, phrenology, and natural theology are other examples of disciplines that are no longer a part of modern science. Scientonomy has formulated accounts of how theories and questions become rejected. Can disciplines also be said to be rejected? If so, how are they rejected? What is the relationship, if any, between discipline rejection and the rejection of theories and questions? An answer to these questions is of great importance to theoretical scientonomy.
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Paul Patton and Cyrus Al-Zayadi in 2021.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
All Theories
If an answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
Suggested Modifications
Current View
There is currently no accepted answer to this question.
Related Topics
This question is a subquestion of Mechanism of Scientific Change.
This topic is also related to the following topic(s):